God's existence, nature and theory

A senseless and clever man created god in the day light time to overcome the power of nature and established his imaginary power over his fellowmen in the name of protecting them from the nature's power.                                                    No theory that proves the existence, need and power of god. As theists use to imagination theory to prove the existence of their god, but a theory that exists in our imagination, can not prove the existence of god. You cannot build a theory on the basis of imagination.                          

A god cannot be invisible in an empty glass. A god cannot be existed beyond our sense organs. Heart is not sense organ that feels us the existence of something. A thing cannot be existed beyond our sense organ.                                       

Now technology is replacing to the functions of our sense organs as AI technolgy, drones, robots, etc. But it can not also prove the existence of god. We can get the similar experience or sense from technology. Sense organs are natural but technology is artificial. Experience of touching or looking a stone idol of god will be similar to the experience that you get through technology.                             Therefore, in brief, if the existence of god can not be proved by our sense organs, similarly that can not be also proven through technology. Stephen Hopkins had already proved that no god exists in our space.

Sachin Pilot is victim of Ashok Gahlot and Congress High Command

In last month Rajya Sabha elections in Rajasthan, Congress got 130 votes in favour of its candidates. Total strength of Assembly is 200, Congress-107, BJP-72, other parties and independent-21 MLAs. Was there no support and labour of Sachin Pilot for the party in Rajya Sabha election? Could Gahlot got alone votes of 130 MLAs out of 200 in Rajya Sabha election? 

What was need of issuing notice to the Deputy CM for what cause? I know Sachin Pilot would not get support of 30 MLAs but it would not benefit to Sachin also. But Sachin can not be sidelined in Rajasthan's politics. 

Ashok Gahlot has been either sidelining or eliminating one after one leader of other castes as Jat, Gurjar, Meena, Bairwa, etc since 1998-99. 

Recent years, Babulal Nagar, Ramlal Jat and Rameshwar Dudi are either left the Congress or sidelined. Why leaders of OBC, SC, and ST are always on the target of Gahlot and now Sachin? It means leaders of these categories have no ability and mass support in both Party and Government. Gahlot does not see ability in other leaders and he keeps him over and above others in both party and government. Old leaders are like old aged lion that have no power himself but use cheap tactics to show the power.

The High Command is highjacked by old leaders. It can not go against old leaders and these leaders have no mass support specially majority votes of youth. But they successfully manage their corteges  around the High Command and foil to every attempt of young leader of entering into the cortege around the HC. This is an organisational culture in the INC. 

The Congress High Command should call back all old leaders in party's organisation. It is only Gujarat at presently there is no old leaders in state's party organisation.  Sachin wants to fullfil his election promises to voters but he is not able to deliver these. 

Ashok Gahlot does not want party's command in hand of Sachin. The ministries and administration both are under control of elite classes. Sachin is already sidelined in the matters of government but the CM is trying to him sideline in the party's matters. The notice issued to Sachin is a result of the ongoing efforts of sidelining him in the party organisation. 

Gahlot does not have trust upon Sachin regarding the stability of his government. I do not think that Sachin is intervening in the matter of governance. But he is boss of his party will have all right to manage all affairs of the party. Even the High Command does not have any objection about Sachin Pilot but as it is knowing fact that the HC is highjacked by old leaders and these leaders are promoting nepotism and hierarchy in the party organisation. 

The Congress High Command never listen to voices of party's MLAs and even in case of Scindhiya and Pradyut Kishor Debbarma party did not learn any lesson. Will cortege of old leaders bring back to Congress to the power? Ashok Gahlot is also a member of this cortege.

Old leaders can not survive without  power and they have no mass support with them also. So if this is situation in Congress, then, the High Command should throw them out. But the problem is that the HC is not able to come out from the cortege to hear to voices of young and mass leaders. 

Congress politics in Rajasthan

Political ambition of a senior leader always kills the ability and good ideology of a young leader and erodes his(her) own good works. Old leaders are power hungers and promote to nepotism in the party that is not acceptable to young leaders. Senior leaders should be involved in the party organisation and young leaders should run the govt. Old versus young leaders is going in the Congress. The High Command should put full stop to this bi-polar politics between old and young leaders. Rajasthan has been bearing the govt of two parties and two leaders since 1998-99. Young leaders have ability of getting the support of all castes. The present leader of the ruling party is not changing his work culture and not giving the way to young leaders.

The learning lessons of the COVID-19 pandemic:

The present COVID-19 pandemic is forced us not only to live in lockdown but also to ruin our urban-economy. The rural economy, society, and culture will save us after the COVID-19 pandemic. We should not be more dependent upon the urban-economy. The virus-borne pandemic diseases are the product of the urban-economy. the rural-economy never shut down because it is a nature-borne system. The urban-economy is a web of urbanization, mechanization, and monoculture systems. It can be shut down and die also because it is an artificially developed system.

The rural economy is based on natural atmosphere, simplicity, sustainability along with diversity and variety. But our urban economy is based on artificial, chemical, and genetically modified techniques that produce only mono-culture. The mono-farming is based on hybrid species that genetically and mechanical modified.

Infectious virus-borne diseases develop only in the atmosphere of mono-culture and mono-farming. The industrial mono-farming of animals, birds, and crops is based on genetically hybrid species. The industrial farming of genetically hybrid crop, pig or chicken or cow depend upon chemical medicines, fertilizers, and artificial atmospheric conditions. These destroy the natural antibodies or auto-immunity power of that animal, bird, and crop. Genetically hybrid variety of a species is to be developed after controlling the natural immunity or antibodies of that species. The mass-level or industrial farming of a gm-species is called mono-farming or mono-culture. This gm-species is very vulnerable to host a naturally borne virus or a foreign guest. Once a foreign virus as a guest finds space on or inside the host; it can be easily transferred to all birds or animals or crops that we are harvesting or farming in one place. The virus affects all animals or birds or crops in a period of time. Gradually, the virus develops or adopts such capability of transferring or occupying another host, which may be human or other birds or animals. If a virus-carrying person lives in an urban or metro space or engaged with mono-farming of animals or birds or crop can affect other people in his/her vicinity.

The disease-history tells us that human-human virus transmission happened only in urban or metro spaces. Because urban or metro space is a center of mono-cultural activities or life. The coronavirus is such a kind of deadly virus that first transferred from animal to human and later it is human-to-human. A small populace in rural areas also living a life of urban-style and having monoculture farming or activities.

In globalization, the flow of people and materials is a must activity and system, that can not be avoided. The virus will spread across the world with the movement of people or materials. The coronavirus is naturally developed in Wuhan like metro or mono-culture space and it spreads across the world with residents or workers moved from here by flights. Our metro areas are centers of urbanization and industrialization and monoculture farming. Sustainability is working more on papers but less on the ground. We have destroyed more than 60 percent of bio-diversity. And many more times we have created monoculture in every aspect of our life or economic activity.

Our cities have less quality air, water, and soil but more dumping grounds, slums, and dirty-congested spaces. A big populace of our metro cities is not healthy, moreover, it lives in an unhealthy atmosphere. Most of the populace in our metro cities is composed of rural migrated workers. They live in unhealthy-physical space under-nutrition and suffering by some or big ailments. Our labor laws are unfavorable to workers and more favorable to owners or managers. Most migrant workers in urban areas do not have adequate facilities and services of health, water, food, and shelter. workers and labors live at their working places more or less without family. The family sense also belongs to the birth locality. It is our emotional and natural senses that want to go back to our roots or birthplace not only in our happy time but also in crisis time.

Migrated workers live in rented rooms and in order for family responsibilities, they live on minimum meets so that they can save more. Even in shutdown days, workers live with no work no pay, or go home, but in lockdown time, they can not go home. Why do migrant people want to go home in lockdown time, because they know (even though governments or NGOs assure them not to go home, stay here) that they can survive at their home in villages but can not survive at their working places? The survival is not only related to just alive amid lockdown time for them, but it is also an association with family and locality. They do not want to live an ostracised life at their working place in lockdown time. In spare time, people use to feel a lack of family or friend’s accompany.

After the COVID-19 pandemic, we will start to build a new economy. What kind of a new economy? Or we will engage again in rebuilding the existing urban-economy. If we will not build a new economy, then we will again face similar pandemic later or soon. We could succeed in the developing a vaccine for coronavirus, but this pandemic is not just because of virus spread or lack of vaccine. But the real problem is our present model of urban-economy. A vaccine can only be a solution to a particular virus-borne pandemic but not of our urban-economy. Therefore, we will have to think in a new way, think about the present state of our urban-economy.

The year-after-year since 1991, the share of rural economy reduced up to 14 percent. On one side, reducing the share of the rural economy, another hand, there is increasing migrant rural workers in our urban-economy centers. We did ignore not only the rural economy but also the variety, diversity, nature, and simplicity of rural society and rural economy. In the last 30 years, we have promoted the monoculture-based on genetically modified techniques, artificial and chemical manufacturing, and production in our urban-centers. Pandemic will occur until we change to the present urban economy. Some my thoughtful suggestion in order to build a new economy after the COVID-19 pandemic comes to over:

1. To revive the rural economy
2. To increase natural variety and diversity of crops, animal and birds that we eat
3. To promote sustainability and biodiversity
4. To strength rural government
5. To regulate rural migration
6. To stop monoculture
7. To make environment, economic and socially healthy and friendly urban atmosphere, space and working and development
8. To expand public health, education and research, and transportation
9. To promote cooperative socialism in rural society and economy.
10. to increase wages and payment of working people in all sectors.

The above piece of text is my personal opinion and understanding about the rural and urban economy and the historical knowledge about the virus-borne disease. Kindly bear to grammatical and textual errors in this piece of writing.

I welcome and happy to hear from you for your views on this piece of writing.

Ambedkar Philosophy and COVID-19

Nature created a non-living protein covered RNA molecular that's size of 0.5 - 0.2 nm or micron as Coronavirus (we can see it only through electronic microscope or larger digital camera) brought the entire world at the point of epic tragedy. Coronavirus can only survive inside human body not ouside for longer time. The RNA property helps its mutation. Its means Coronavirus can adopt and change itself after entering in human body. It is still out of cured by any biological or chemical medicine but can be protected by humanitarian measures. But human created God is also a non-living thing or property without any size, shape and existence. It has only one property that mythical religious believe (MRB) of human. We can not see this God or similar to non-living particle through any kind of device or machine. God proven useless whenever humanity come to face its existence crisis like the present one COVID-19. Throughout the world, God believers + governments spent unaccounted and countless trillion dollars in the name of God or its power or existence but this world spent only countable money in the medical research and health infrastructural development. We have more temples, less hospitals. We have more gods, less doctors. It is because of the Brahmanical philosophy or upper caste elites' religious mixed socialism. Brahmanical socialism has only one working-principle: production and consumption of goods according to ability of person and the ability of person is either earned through privilege or power. But Ambedkar socialism is based on the need of a person and the need is according to right.    

Ambedkar philosophy is rightly required in this time. Ambedkar's model of socialism is relevant much more in this time. We should learn from societies of South Korea, Japan, Taiwan, and  China also. Indian socialism or communism is a product  of privileged system of upper castes  or liberal elite peoples and it gets end due to their own counter-product. The socialism of liberal elite's or upper caste does not fit to lower caste or traditional social distancing communities. That's reason why Indian liberal elite's socialism failed in both economical and socially? 

Only Ambedkar socialism can save us in time of crisis because its rooted in cooperative community social soil. Ambedkar used to say that we are socialist by nature. Because Ambedkar socialism is based on the potent structure of lower castes' traditional community socialism and cooperative system. Rural economy and collective cooperative structure of rural communities can survive and save us also in the time of troubling economy or social tragedy. 

Village or lower caste community's social and economic model is kind of problem-solving, sustainable and all-time fit. Why did Ambedkar's socialist philosophy not grow up because lower caste communities still gripped into Brahmanical or liberal elite's religion mixed socialism? Liberal Religious socialism is not only created but also nurtured by political forces of upper castes. 

Political majority always appear in favour of upper caste interests. In COVID-19, the ruling political forces made invisible majority in favour of migrated people of liberal elites and upper caste living in abroad brought back by flights with public exchequer to home. But the same majority of upper caste controlled power did not show any interest in favour of migrated domestic workforce of lower castes for sending them back to homes. If once the lower caste communities come out from the grippe of Brahmanical socialism or religious philosophical socialism of upper castes or liberal elites, what option will remain for us, that is, only Ambedkar socialism. 

The COVID-19 pandemic is the right time to re-establish to Ambedkar socialism on the ground. Recently World Bank also analysed that after the COVID-19 crisis over only economies of China and India will survive because Chinese economic is based on market socialism and India's economy is based on village socialism. The least but not the last, I conclude my views with a remark of Philip Spratt: The socialist bureaucracy is the modern form of the caste system - Philip Spratt, 1966.'

Who is attacking of idea of a progressive, peaceful and harmonious society their faces are being unveiling?

These two masked guys ...are identified as attackers on the idea of India...like Komal Sharma is identified attacker on the idea of JNU.

Why the Nationwide general strike was necessitated at this time in India

https://sljangu.wordpress.com/2020/01/08/why-the-nationwide-general-strike-was-necessitated-at-this-time-in-india/