Chin Refugees, Relocation of Assam Rifles and Amit Shah Visits to Aizawl

The Union Home Minister Amit Shah's Visit to Aizawl

Dr Suwa Lal Jangu, Assistant Professor, Political Science, Mizoram University, Aizawl

Union Home Minister Amit Shah has arrived in Aizawl to preside over the handing-over ceremony of the Assam Rifles' operational office. This operational command, currently situated in the heart of Aizawl, will be relocated to Zokhawsang, which is 15 kilometres away. The Union Home Minister is on a three-day visit to Assam from March 14 to 16. At the invitation of Mizoram Chief Minister Lalduhoma, he is expected to be in Aizawl around 2 PM on Saturday, March 15, before returning to Guwahati the same day.

Unexpectedly, the Chief Minister travelled to New Delhi on Wednesday and returned to Aizawl on Thursday. There are speculations that the Ministry of External Affairs has summoned Lalduhoma to provide a personal statement regarding a ceasefire he brokered between two Chin rebel groups from Myanmar in Aizawl on February 26, which he did without the permission of the Ministry of External Affairs.

During the event in Aizawl, Home Minister Amit Shah emphasized that one of the top priorities of the Narendra Modi government is to promote development in the northeastern states and to establish lasting peace in the region. He stated that the relocation of the Assam Rifles reflects the central government's commitment to fulfilling the aspirations of the local population. This move is crucial for the development of both Mizoram and Aizawl, a task that has been hindered for the past 35 years due to the local topography and lack of suitable land.

Amit Shah remarked that the relocation decision represents not just a significant action taken by the Narendra Modi government for the benefit of Aizawl's residents, but also signifies the central government's responsibility toward the Mizo people. He added that the BJP government at the centre seeks to ensure security, peace, and beauty in Mizoram, with the Prime Minister personally overseeing development projects in the state.

On October 23, 2024, an agreement was signed between the Mizoram state government and the Assam Rifles (AR) in New Delhi to move the operational battalion of AR from Aizawl City to Zokhawsang by April 30 of this year. However, the 23 Sector Headquarters (the administrative headquarters) of the Assam Rifles will continue to operate in Khatla, along with its DIG residence near the Raj Bhavan. The area that will be vacated following the location of the operational command will be designated for public use under the Transferred Land Restricted Use Act of 2022.

The Assam Rifles were established in Aizawl in 1925, the same year the city was founded. They are the oldest paramilitary force in India, originally raised in 1835 as the Cachar Levy Militia and adopting their current name in 1917. Operating under the control of the Indian Army, the Assam Rifles function under the Ministries of Home Affairs and Defence, with their personnel recruited from the Indian Army.

The demand to relocate the operational command of the Assam Rifles from Aizawl was first raised by the Mizo National Front (MNF) government, led by Laldenga, in 1988, following a violent clash that resulted in the deaths of a dozen people. In February 2019, Union Home Minister Rajnath Singh instructed the Assam Rifles to move to a new site at Zokhawsang by May 31 of that year. However, the relocation process was delayed Due to a lack of basic facilities at Zokhawsang. In April 2023, Amit Shah inaugurated the construction of the new operational command complex of the Assam Rifles at Zokhawsang. The 23 Sector Assam Rifles headquarters in Aizawl City houses two cannons that date back to the Battle of Waterloo in 1815. The Aizawl Fort and the Quarter Guards of the Assam Rifles were established in Aizawl between 1892 and 1897 at the HR Ground.

Residents of the city have voiced their concerns about the operational command being located in the city centre, citing issues related to urban expansion and various inconveniences. Additionally, this issue has become a political topic, particularly for the MNF, which made the transfer of the operational command a focal point in the 2018 and 2023 assembly elections. Tensions have arisen between the central government and the previous MNF administration regarding the Assam Rifles' relocation.

Recently, Mizoram social activist VL Thlamuanpuia wrote to the Union Home Minister about the refugees in the state. He previously met with Mizoram Governor Dr VK Singh to discuss this issue, urging the Governor to bring the matter to the attention of the central government and advocate for policies that prevent cross-border crime while emphasizing the need for stricter border controls. In his letter, Thlamuanpuia highlighted the rising influx of Myanmar refugees in Mizoram, expressing concerns over its implications for national security, demographic changes in the state, and the strain on local resources.

India has always treated its neighbouring refugees based on humanitarian values. In this letter, the government was requested to immediately intervene to protect the interests of Indian citizens, defend national security and maintain law and order in the border states. In fact, due to the internal civil war going on in Myanmar, uncontrolled and unverified Myanmar citizens are entering Mizoram. Thlamuanpuia wrote that the entry of foreigners into India across the border is increasing the challenges and potential security risks to border security. Due to the increase in incidents of cross-border crimes, activities like human trafficking, illegal trade of narcotics and psychotropic substances, and trade of explosive materials are posing a serious threat to public safety and national security in the state. Apart from this, the attention of the central government has been drawn through the letter that fake documents are being used on a large scale by illegal immigrants.

Thlamuanpuia has appealed to the Centre to implement a strong authentication system to check and prevent fake Indian identity documents, intensive monitoring and stringent legal mechanisms to prevent illegal smuggling across the border. Through his letter, the social activist urged the Union Home Minister to take a systematic and controlled policy and measures to prevent illegal infiltration by strengthening security on the Myanmar border, checking refugees, and documenting authentication and management. On March 10, Chief Minister Lalduhoma told the AAssembly that US and UK citizens come and go through Mizoram to train insurgents in Myanmar. Lalduhoma said that about 2000 foreigners had come to Aizawl during June - December last year. Most of them were US and UK citizens who were never seen on the streets and roads of Aizawl and it is suspected that they would aim to go to Myanmar.

According to Indian intelligence agencies, the presence of US and Chinese personnel in Myanmar has led to an unexpected increase in sensitive activities on the Indo-Myanmar border. Recently, the US ambassador also suddenly came to Aizawl without prior information. Recently, the Union Home Ministry re-imposed the Protected Area Regime in Mizoram, Manipur and Nagaland bordering Myanmar. Lengpui Airport in Aizawl is the only airport in the northeastern border states that is controlled by the Mizoram state government instead of the Airport Authority of India (AAI). The central government has increased surveillance on the Indo-Myanmar border area and is closely watching the situation developing in the Indo-Myanmar border.

Mizoram Facilitates A Peace Pact Between Two Chin Rebel Groups of Myanmar

	Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for more Mizoram Facilitates the Peace Pact between Chin Rebel groups of Myanmar Suwalal Jangu Mar 12   READ IN APP   Mizoram Facilitates the Peace Pact between Chin Rebel Groups of Myanmar Dr. Suwa Lal Jangu, Assistant Professor of Political Science at Mizoram University, Aizawl Mizoram Chief Minister Lalduhawma is facing criticism for brokering a peace deal between two anti-military Junta Chin rebel groups from Myanmar's Chin State on February 26 in Aizawl. The Union Ministry of External Affairs has issued a stern reprimand, advising him against such actions in the future. Foreign affairs are under the jurisdiction of the Central Government, meaning that the Chief Minister or any state leader is prohibited from meeting with foreign representatives or party leaders without prior permission. Political analysts view Lalduhawma's initiative as unconstitutional and a violation of India’s international protocols. Central security forces were aware of the recent two-day visit by Mizoram Rajya Sabha MP K Vanlalvena to Myanmar's Chin State, where approximately a dozen representatives from the two Chinland rebel groups opposing the military Junta arrived. On September 4, 2024, CM Lalduhawma encouraged the Chin community in the United States to forge friendships with the Arakan community and the Arakan Army. On February 26, a peace agreement was signed between the anti-military groups in Chin State, facilitated by Lalduhawma. This agreement was established between the Chin National Army, the military wing of the Chinland Council, and the Chin Brotherhood, the military wing of the Interim Chinland National Consultative Council. The mediation was conducted by Mizoram's Advocacy Group for Peace, and three representatives from these four groups signed the agreement in Aizawl. The agreement aims to end internal conflict between the two rebel groups, which have been fighting against Myanmar's military regime in Chin State.  These anti-military groups have two main democratic objectives: the establishment of a democratic system in Myanmar and the creation of a federal structure for Chin State. Under the agreement, an administrative unit called the Chin National Council (CNC) will be formed, along with an integrated armed command. Various Chin rebel organizations have been embroiled in conflict for the last two years, hindering their ability to mount a successful resistance against the military junta due to internal factional strife. A constitution drafting committee will be formed for Chin State under this peace pact, which will include members from both CC/CNA and ICNCC/CB. Chin leaders from Myanmar in Aizawl have appealed to all communities (referred to as Zonathlak in Mizo) in the state to support this pact, emphasizing that it will foster common understanding, unity, and, ultimately, peace. Thawng Ning Kee, Deputy Chairperson of the Chinland Council and Chief Negotiator, expressed confidence that the Chin Peace Pact will bring unity and strength to Myanmar's pro-democracy groups in Chin State. Lalduhawma is the founder of the Mizoram Advocacy Group for Peace (MAGP), which has played a crucial role in achieving the ceasefire and peace agreement between these two groups in Chin State. The MAGP, composed of leaders from influential civil society organizations and public figures, has been working to end hostilities between the two insurgent groups fighting internally since 2022, as well as against Myanmar's military junta. Additionally, Mizoram-based organizations such as the Young Mizo Association (YMA) and Zo-Reunification Organisation (ZORO) have also been striving to foster reconciliation among various pro-democracy and anti-military junta insurgent groups in Chin State for many years. On February 27, Mizoram Rajya Sabha MP K Vanlalvena visited the Victoria Camp of the Chin National Front (CNF) in Chin State, Myanmar. During his meeting with leaders of the Chin rebel groups, Vanlalvena emphasized the need for a political settlement between the warring factions in Chinland. He pointed out that all factions share the common goal of restoring democracy in Myanmar and establishing a federal entity for Chin State.  He also highlighted the common ethnic identity of the various Zo-ethnic communities living across India, Bangladesh, and Myanmar. "These communities share the same ancestry, yet geopolitical boundaries and linguistic differences have divided them," Vanlalvena stated. "We are one nation; we must work tirelessly for national unity." He proposed that a collective term — Zofate — should be used for ethnic Zo/Mizos.  The Zofate ethnic community, which is predominantly Christian, resides in the Indo-Burmese hilly region stretching from Chittagong in Bangladesh to the Chindwin River in Myanmar, surrounded by nations with Hindu, Muslim, and Buddhist majorities. Vanlalvena noted, "This Christian ethnic community has survived amid three religious nations due to their belief in divine guidance. The survival of the Zofate community will ultimately depend on the will of God." Vanlalvena received a "Guard of Honour" from China and troops at CNA's Victoria Camp in Chinlung City, accompanied by a warm welcome from leaders of the Chinland Council and the Chinland Government. The Rajya Sabha Member of Parliament (MP) from Mizoram also met Chin State Chief Minister Pathanga, as well as China and ministers and commanders of the Chin National Army (CNA). On February 28, he visited the Chin village of Khawmawi, located near Zokhawthar in Mizoram along the Indo-Myanmar border, where he engaged with local civil government leaders. The MP noted that the Tiau River, which separates Mizoram and Myanmar, is not a legitimate boundary for the Zofate communities. He proposed that if the Indian government insists on the border fence, it should be built in the plains of Bangladesh and on the Chindwin River in Myanmar. Internal conflicts among insurgents in Chin State have led to the loss of life and property on both sides, which benefits the military regime but harms residents. Nevertheless, the Chin insurgent groups in Myanmar are not anti-India, and there is no security threat to India stemming from this pact, as these groups seek positive and democratic cooperation with India. There are deep-seated familial ties and mutual dependence between the cross-border communities of India and Myanmar. Due to military rule in Myanmar, the people of Chin State have become isolated and are currently facing a crisis of civil rights.  Thanks to strong community relations along the India-Myanmar border, there have been no military confrontations or conflicts between two cross-border communities. However, illegal activities have increased near the border due to military rule in Myanmar and the presence of insurgent groups in northeastern India. This situation has resulted in unrest, insecurity, and violence in the border states of India. Fortunately, due to robust community ties and effective political leadership in the Border States, crises are being managed. The political leadership in the northeastern states, along with community and political leaders across the border, should be recognized by the governments of India and Myanmar not only as sources of soft power but also as vital players in enhancing economic ties and fostering people-to-people connections between the two countries. Politicians from Manipur have voiced their concerns over a peace deal between the Chin rebels of Myanmar, facilitated by Mizoram Chief Minister Lalduhawma, particularly due to the absence of any representative from the Indian government. They are worried about the potential involvement of insurgent groups from Myanmar’s Chin State in the ongoing violence in Manipur and invited Chin rebels to Mizoram for discussions. The peace deal being negotiated in Aizawl aims to regulate the entry of Chin individuals into the northeastern states via the India-Myanmar border.  Currently, Chin rebels control 80 per cent of Chin State, while the Arakan Army has taken control of the Arakan region. Former Mizoram Chief Minister Zoramthanga has also played a mediating role on several occasions. It is crucial to ensure that national interests do not conflict with public interests along the international border of the northeastern states, as the national interest of any country should not supersede the interests of its citizens. The needs, concerns, and disagreements of border populations must be acknowledged. Lasting peace and stability in the cross-border region can only be achieved through cooperation and mutual respect for each other neighbours.

God's existence, nature and theory

A senseless and clever man created god in the day light time to overcome the power of nature and established his imaginary power over his fellowmen in the name of protecting them from the nature's power.                                                    No theory that proves the existence, need and power of god. As theists use to imagination theory to prove the existence of their god, but a theory that exists in our imagination, can not prove the existence of god. You cannot build a theory on the basis of imagination.                          

A god cannot be invisible in an empty glass. A god cannot be existed beyond our sense organs. Heart is not sense organ that feels us the existence of something. A thing cannot be existed beyond our sense organ.                                       

Now technology is replacing to the functions of our sense organs as AI technolgy, drones, robots, etc. But it can not also prove the existence of god. We can get the similar experience or sense from technology. Sense organs are natural but technology is artificial. Experience of touching or looking a stone idol of god will be similar to the experience that you get through technology.                             Therefore, in brief, if the existence of god can not be proved by our sense organs, similarly that can not be also proven through technology. Stephen Hopkins had already proved that no god exists in our space.

Sachin Pilot is victim of Ashok Gahlot and Congress High Command

In last month Rajya Sabha elections in Rajasthan, Congress got 130 votes in favour of its candidates. Total strength of Assembly is 200, Congress-107, BJP-72, other parties and independent-21 MLAs. Was there no support and labour of Sachin Pilot for the party in Rajya Sabha election? Could Gahlot got alone votes of 130 MLAs out of 200 in Rajya Sabha election? 

What was need of issuing notice to the Deputy CM for what cause? I know Sachin Pilot would not get support of 30 MLAs but it would not benefit to Sachin also. But Sachin can not be sidelined in Rajasthan's politics. 

Ashok Gahlot has been either sidelining or eliminating one after one leader of other castes as Jat, Gurjar, Meena, Bairwa, etc since 1998-99. 

Recent years, Babulal Nagar, Ramlal Jat and Rameshwar Dudi are either left the Congress or sidelined. Why leaders of OBC, SC, and ST are always on the target of Gahlot and now Sachin? It means leaders of these categories have no ability and mass support in both Party and Government. Gahlot does not see ability in other leaders and he keeps him over and above others in both party and government. Old leaders are like old aged lion that have no power himself but use cheap tactics to show the power.

The High Command is highjacked by old leaders. It can not go against old leaders and these leaders have no mass support specially majority votes of youth. But they successfully manage their corteges  around the High Command and foil to every attempt of young leader of entering into the cortege around the HC. This is an organisational culture in the INC. 

The Congress High Command should call back all old leaders in party's organisation. It is only Gujarat at presently there is no old leaders in state's party organisation.  Sachin wants to fullfil his election promises to voters but he is not able to deliver these. 

Ashok Gahlot does not want party's command in hand of Sachin. The ministries and administration both are under control of elite classes. Sachin is already sidelined in the matters of government but the CM is trying to him sideline in the party's matters. The notice issued to Sachin is a result of the ongoing efforts of sidelining him in the party organisation. 

Gahlot does not have trust upon Sachin regarding the stability of his government. I do not think that Sachin is intervening in the matter of governance. But he is boss of his party will have all right to manage all affairs of the party. Even the High Command does not have any objection about Sachin Pilot but as it is knowing fact that the HC is highjacked by old leaders and these leaders are promoting nepotism and hierarchy in the party organisation. 

The Congress High Command never listen to voices of party's MLAs and even in case of Scindhiya and Pradyut Kishor Debbarma party did not learn any lesson. Will cortege of old leaders bring back to Congress to the power? Ashok Gahlot is also a member of this cortege.

Old leaders can not survive without  power and they have no mass support with them also. So if this is situation in Congress, then, the High Command should throw them out. But the problem is that the HC is not able to come out from the cortege to hear to voices of young and mass leaders. 

Congress politics in Rajasthan

Political ambition of a senior leader always kills the ability and good ideology of a young leader and erodes his(her) own good works. Old leaders are power hungers and promote to nepotism in the party that is not acceptable to young leaders. Senior leaders should be involved in the party organisation and young leaders should run the govt. Old versus young leaders is going in the Congress. The High Command should put full stop to this bi-polar politics between old and young leaders. Rajasthan has been bearing the govt of two parties and two leaders since 1998-99. Young leaders have ability of getting the support of all castes. The present leader of the ruling party is not changing his work culture and not giving the way to young leaders.

The learning lessons of the COVID-19 pandemic:

The present COVID-19 pandemic is forced us not only to live in lockdown but also to ruin our urban-economy. The rural economy, society, and culture will save us after the COVID-19 pandemic. We should not be more dependent upon the urban-economy. The virus-borne pandemic diseases are the product of the urban-economy. the rural-economy never shut down because it is a nature-borne system. The urban-economy is a web of urbanization, mechanization, and monoculture systems. It can be shut down and die also because it is an artificially developed system.

The rural economy is based on natural atmosphere, simplicity, sustainability along with diversity and variety. But our urban economy is based on artificial, chemical, and genetically modified techniques that produce only mono-culture. The mono-farming is based on hybrid species that genetically and mechanical modified.

Infectious virus-borne diseases develop only in the atmosphere of mono-culture and mono-farming. The industrial mono-farming of animals, birds, and crops is based on genetically hybrid species. The industrial farming of genetically hybrid crop, pig or chicken or cow depend upon chemical medicines, fertilizers, and artificial atmospheric conditions. These destroy the natural antibodies or auto-immunity power of that animal, bird, and crop. Genetically hybrid variety of a species is to be developed after controlling the natural immunity or antibodies of that species. The mass-level or industrial farming of a gm-species is called mono-farming or mono-culture. This gm-species is very vulnerable to host a naturally borne virus or a foreign guest. Once a foreign virus as a guest finds space on or inside the host; it can be easily transferred to all birds or animals or crops that we are harvesting or farming in one place. The virus affects all animals or birds or crops in a period of time. Gradually, the virus develops or adopts such capability of transferring or occupying another host, which may be human or other birds or animals. If a virus-carrying person lives in an urban or metro space or engaged with mono-farming of animals or birds or crop can affect other people in his/her vicinity.

The disease-history tells us that human-human virus transmission happened only in urban or metro spaces. Because urban or metro space is a center of mono-cultural activities or life. The coronavirus is such a kind of deadly virus that first transferred from animal to human and later it is human-to-human. A small populace in rural areas also living a life of urban-style and having monoculture farming or activities.

In globalization, the flow of people and materials is a must activity and system, that can not be avoided. The virus will spread across the world with the movement of people or materials. The coronavirus is naturally developed in Wuhan like metro or mono-culture space and it spreads across the world with residents or workers moved from here by flights. Our metro areas are centers of urbanization and industrialization and monoculture farming. Sustainability is working more on papers but less on the ground. We have destroyed more than 60 percent of bio-diversity. And many more times we have created monoculture in every aspect of our life or economic activity.

Our cities have less quality air, water, and soil but more dumping grounds, slums, and dirty-congested spaces. A big populace of our metro cities is not healthy, moreover, it lives in an unhealthy atmosphere. Most of the populace in our metro cities is composed of rural migrated workers. They live in unhealthy-physical space under-nutrition and suffering by some or big ailments. Our labor laws are unfavorable to workers and more favorable to owners or managers. Most migrant workers in urban areas do not have adequate facilities and services of health, water, food, and shelter. workers and labors live at their working places more or less without family. The family sense also belongs to the birth locality. It is our emotional and natural senses that want to go back to our roots or birthplace not only in our happy time but also in crisis time.

Migrated workers live in rented rooms and in order for family responsibilities, they live on minimum meets so that they can save more. Even in shutdown days, workers live with no work no pay, or go home, but in lockdown time, they can not go home. Why do migrant people want to go home in lockdown time, because they know (even though governments or NGOs assure them not to go home, stay here) that they can survive at their home in villages but can not survive at their working places? The survival is not only related to just alive amid lockdown time for them, but it is also an association with family and locality. They do not want to live an ostracised life at their working place in lockdown time. In spare time, people use to feel a lack of family or friend’s accompany.

After the COVID-19 pandemic, we will start to build a new economy. What kind of a new economy? Or we will engage again in rebuilding the existing urban-economy. If we will not build a new economy, then we will again face similar pandemic later or soon. We could succeed in the developing a vaccine for coronavirus, but this pandemic is not just because of virus spread or lack of vaccine. But the real problem is our present model of urban-economy. A vaccine can only be a solution to a particular virus-borne pandemic but not of our urban-economy. Therefore, we will have to think in a new way, think about the present state of our urban-economy.

The year-after-year since 1991, the share of rural economy reduced up to 14 percent. On one side, reducing the share of the rural economy, another hand, there is increasing migrant rural workers in our urban-economy centers. We did ignore not only the rural economy but also the variety, diversity, nature, and simplicity of rural society and rural economy. In the last 30 years, we have promoted the monoculture-based on genetically modified techniques, artificial and chemical manufacturing, and production in our urban-centers. Pandemic will occur until we change to the present urban economy. Some my thoughtful suggestion in order to build a new economy after the COVID-19 pandemic comes to over:

1. To revive the rural economy
2. To increase natural variety and diversity of crops, animal and birds that we eat
3. To promote sustainability and biodiversity
4. To strength rural government
5. To regulate rural migration
6. To stop monoculture
7. To make environment, economic and socially healthy and friendly urban atmosphere, space and working and development
8. To expand public health, education and research, and transportation
9. To promote cooperative socialism in rural society and economy.
10. to increase wages and payment of working people in all sectors.

The above piece of text is my personal opinion and understanding about the rural and urban economy and the historical knowledge about the virus-borne disease. Kindly bear to grammatical and textual errors in this piece of writing.

I welcome and happy to hear from you for your views on this piece of writing.

Ambedkar Philosophy and COVID-19

Nature created a non-living protein covered RNA molecular that's size of 0.5 - 0.2 nm or micron as Coronavirus (we can see it only through electronic microscope or larger digital camera) brought the entire world at the point of epic tragedy. Coronavirus can only survive inside human body not ouside for longer time. The RNA property helps its mutation. Its means Coronavirus can adopt and change itself after entering in human body. It is still out of cured by any biological or chemical medicine but can be protected by humanitarian measures. But human created God is also a non-living thing or property without any size, shape and existence. It has only one property that mythical religious believe (MRB) of human. We can not see this God or similar to non-living particle through any kind of device or machine. God proven useless whenever humanity come to face its existence crisis like the present one COVID-19. Throughout the world, God believers + governments spent unaccounted and countless trillion dollars in the name of God or its power or existence but this world spent only countable money in the medical research and health infrastructural development. We have more temples, less hospitals. We have more gods, less doctors. It is because of the Brahmanical philosophy or upper caste elites' religious mixed socialism. Brahmanical socialism has only one working-principle: production and consumption of goods according to ability of person and the ability of person is either earned through privilege or power. But Ambedkar socialism is based on the need of a person and the need is according to right.    

Ambedkar philosophy is rightly required in this time. Ambedkar's model of socialism is relevant much more in this time. We should learn from societies of South Korea, Japan, Taiwan, and  China also. Indian socialism or communism is a product  of privileged system of upper castes  or liberal elite peoples and it gets end due to their own counter-product. The socialism of liberal elite's or upper caste does not fit to lower caste or traditional social distancing communities. That's reason why Indian liberal elite's socialism failed in both economical and socially? 

Only Ambedkar socialism can save us in time of crisis because its rooted in cooperative community social soil. Ambedkar used to say that we are socialist by nature. Because Ambedkar socialism is based on the potent structure of lower castes' traditional community socialism and cooperative system. Rural economy and collective cooperative structure of rural communities can survive and save us also in the time of troubling economy or social tragedy. 

Village or lower caste community's social and economic model is kind of problem-solving, sustainable and all-time fit. Why did Ambedkar's socialist philosophy not grow up because lower caste communities still gripped into Brahmanical or liberal elite's religion mixed socialism? Liberal Religious socialism is not only created but also nurtured by political forces of upper castes. 

Political majority always appear in favour of upper caste interests. In COVID-19, the ruling political forces made invisible majority in favour of migrated people of liberal elites and upper caste living in abroad brought back by flights with public exchequer to home. But the same majority of upper caste controlled power did not show any interest in favour of migrated domestic workforce of lower castes for sending them back to homes. If once the lower caste communities come out from the grippe of Brahmanical socialism or religious philosophical socialism of upper castes or liberal elites, what option will remain for us, that is, only Ambedkar socialism. 

The COVID-19 pandemic is the right time to re-establish to Ambedkar socialism on the ground. Recently World Bank also analysed that after the COVID-19 crisis over only economies of China and India will survive because Chinese economic is based on market socialism and India's economy is based on village socialism. The least but not the last, I conclude my views with a remark of Philip Spratt: The socialist bureaucracy is the modern form of the caste system - Philip Spratt, 1966.'